Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Longcat Flash Chat

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 5 categories and Longcat Flash Chat in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 29.7 to 19.0.
  • Longcat Flash Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Longcat Flash Chat specifications
GLM-5V-TurboLongcat Flash Chat
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Meituan
Noometry Index43.842.1
Released2026-04-01—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1919

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Coding14661471
LMArena WebDev1401—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts14431440
Kagi LLM Benchmark—43.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—17.7%

Math Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Math14411442

Knowledge Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Expert14521454

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Longcat Flash Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Non-English14201404
LMArena Chinese14881465
LMArena French14441456
LMArena German14231408
LMArena Korean13961371
LMArena Russian14311395
LMArena Spanish14501445
LMArena Japanese—1373

Instruction Following Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Instruction Following14231411

Long Context Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Longer Query14381425

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLongcat Flash Chat
LMArena Text14371427
LMArena Creative Writing14161388
LMArena Multi-Turn14321418

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Longcat Flash Chat?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Longcat Flash Chat better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Longcat Flash Chat share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Longcat Flash Chat has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper