Model comparison

Longcat Flash Chat vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

Longcat Flash Chat Meituan

42.1

Rank #120 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Longcat Flash Chat scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M3 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 40.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 17.7% for Longcat Flash Chat and 65.1% for MiniMax-M3.

Side by side

Longcat Flash Chat and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Longcat Flash ChatMiniMax-M3
ProviderMeituanMiniMax
Noometry Index42.143.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1941

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Longcat Flash Chat leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#87), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding14711469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
ALE-Bench—640.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 19.0 (#272), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiniMax-M3
NYT Connections (extended)17.7%65.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts14401447
SimpleBench—45.8%
Kagi LLM Benchmark43.9%—
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 39.4 (#107), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiniMax-M3
LMArena Math14421429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 40.6 (#116), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiniMax-M3
LMArena Expert14541461
GPQA Diamond—90.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Longcat Flash Chat: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 51.9 (#101), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English14041420
LMArena Chinese14651463
LMArena French14561447
LMArena German14081426
LMArena Japanese13731381
LMArena Korean13711372
LMArena Russian13951428
LMArena Spanish14451432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 74.4 (#96), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following14111433

Long Context Too close to call

Longcat Flash Chat: 43.5 (#93), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query14251445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Longcat Flash Chat: 61.0 (#91), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkLongcat Flash ChatMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text14271433
LMArena Creative Writing13881404
LMArena Multi-Turn14181442
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Longcat Flash Chat better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Longcat Flash Chat or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

Longcat Flash Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.5 versus 41.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Longcat Flash Chat and MiniMax-M3 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Longcat Flash Chat has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper