Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs Solar Pro4
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index. Solar Pro4 costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Solar Pro4 in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 56.5.
- Solar Pro4 is cheaper at $0.30 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
- Solar Pro4 accepts more context: 524K tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 42.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 524K |
| Max output | 131K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | 1371 |
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | 1437 |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | 1399 |
Math Too close to call
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | 1416 |
Knowledge Too close to call
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | 1427 |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Solar Pro4: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1444 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1423 | 1364 |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | 1401 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1309 |
Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | 1377 |
Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Solar Pro4?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index. Solar Pro4 costs 3.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-5V-Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.
Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro4 does, with 524K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.