Model comparison

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 vs GLM-5V-Turbo

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 56.6.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and GLM-5V-Turbo specifications
Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20GLM-5V-Turbo
ProviderAmazonZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index42.143.8
Released—2026-04-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.20
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1719

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.6 (#123), GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20GLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Coding14121466
LMArena WebDev—1401

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 28.4 (#106), GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20GLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Hard Prompts13961443

Math Too close to call

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 39.0 (#119), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20GLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Math14251441

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 38.5 (#144), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20GLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Expert13861452

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: —, GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20GLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Vision—1264
LMArena Document—1416

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 49.5 (#131), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20GLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Non-English13721420
LMArena Chinese14041488
LMArena French14251444
LMArena German13911423
LMArena Korean13241396
LMArena Russian13711431
LMArena Spanish13821450
LMArena Japanese1360—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 72.1 (#141), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20GLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following13651423

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 41.7 (#133), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20GLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Longer Query13701438

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20: 56.6 (#136), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20GLM-5V-Turbo
LMArena Text13941437
LMArena Creative Writing13181416
LMArena Multi-Turn13641432

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 better than GLM-5V-Turbo?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (41.6 vs 42.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 and GLM-5V-Turbo share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Experimental Chat 10 20 has 17 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper