Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 31.1.
  • Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
GLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)IBM
Noometry Index43.831.6
Released2026-04-01—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked1914

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding14661112
LMArena WebDev1401—
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14431092

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math14411143

Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert14521087

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14201037
LMArena Chinese14881063
LMArena Russian14311060
LMArena French1444—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following14231088

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14381122

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text14371096
LMArena Creative Writing14161071
LMArena Multi-Turn14321063

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper