Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat NVIDIA

31.8

Rank #268 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 31.6.
  • Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat specifications
GLM-5V-TurboLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)NVIDIA
Noometry Index43.831.8
Released2026-04-01—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.20—
Output $ / M tokens$4—
Results tracked199

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.9 (#300)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Coding14661025
LMArena WebDev1401—

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 20.0 (#246)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts14431047

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.3 (#226)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Math14411072

Knowledge Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Expert1452—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Vision1264—
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#270)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Non-English14201063
LMArena Chinese1488—
LMArena French1444—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Russian1431—
LMArena Spanish1450—

Instruction Following GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.2 (#279)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Instruction Following14231060

Long Context GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#288)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Longer Query1438998

Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.6 (#283)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboLlama2 70b Steerlm Chat
LMArena Text14371098
LMArena Creative Writing14161091
LMArena Multi-Turn14321058

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?

GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper