Model comparison

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct vs MiniMax-M3

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.6

Rank #270 Confirmed

MiniMax-M3 MiniMax

43.8

Rank #85 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M3 leads 62.1 to 31.1.

Side by side

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiniMax-M3 specifications
Granite 3.0 8b InstructMiniMax-M3
ProviderIBMMiniMax
Noometry Index31.643.8
Released—2026-06-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—1M
Max output—512K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.30
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1441

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.7 (#301), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Coding11121469
FrontierCode—14.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
SciCode—47.1%
BigCodeBench Instruct29.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete35.4%—
ALE-Bench—640.02

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiniMax-M3
APEX-Agents—37.7%
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
GBAEval—0.9%
Vending-Bench 2—2,158

Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.9 (#230), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Hard Prompts10921447
SimpleBench—45.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—65.1%
CritPt—3.7%
Chess Puzzles—14%
Mystery Game Puzzles—8%
DTBench—78.9%
LMCA—33.7%
Surface Evolver Bench—55%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.95
ForecastBench—61.4

Math MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 32.8 (#210), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Math11431429
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—71.1%
ProofBench—18%

Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.6 (#236), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Expert10871461
GPQA Diamond—90.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —, MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Vision—1253
LMArena Document—1435

Multilingual MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.2 (#276), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Non-English10371420
LMArena Chinese10631463
LMArena Russian10601428
LMArena French—1447
LMArena German—1426
LMArena Japanese—1381
LMArena Korean—1372
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.0 (#276), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Instruction Following10881433

Long Context MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#252), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Longer Query11221445

Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#285), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGranite 3.0 8b InstructMiniMax-M3
LMArena Text10961433
LMArena Creative Writing10711404
LMArena Multi-Turn10631442
EQ-Bench 4—1150

Frequently asked questions

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better than MiniMax-M3?

MiniMax-M3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Granite 3.0 8b Instruct or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?

MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 29.7 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Granite 3.0 8b Instruct and MiniMax-M3 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.

Related comparisons

Go deeper