Model comparison
GLM-5V-Turbo vs o1-pro
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 40.6 to 29.7.
- GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper at $1.20 / $4 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
Side by side
| GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-01 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 200K |
| Max output | 131K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.20 | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $4 | $600 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1466 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1443 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1441 | — |
Knowledge GLM-5V-Turbo leads
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1452 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Document | 1416 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1488 | — |
| LMArena French | 1444 | — |
| LMArena German | 1423 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1396 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1431 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1450 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1423 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1438 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | GLM-5V-Turbo | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1437 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1416 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1432 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than o1-pro?
GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or o1-pro?
GLM-5V-Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $1.20 per million input tokens and $4 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 200K tokens.
How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.