Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.1 to 47.7.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 43.4 (#79)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1488 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 29.6 (#81)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1483 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 37.3 (#99)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1473 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1489 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.4 (#21)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1483 |
| LMArena German | 1336 | 1487 |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1472 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1497 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.2 (#28)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#44)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1477 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.1 (#39)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1478 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 40.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.