Z.ai (Zhipu), open weights
GLM-4.7-Flash
GLM-4.7-Flash by Z.ai (Zhipu) ranks 180th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 38.8. Its strongest category is coding, where it ranks 135th. API pricing starts at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens, with a 200K-token context window.
Last verified
Specifications
- Noometry rank
- #180 of 354
- Index score
- 38.8
- Evidence
- Confirmed 21 results
- Provider
- Z.ai (Zhipu)
- Released
- January 19, 2026
- Weights
- Open weights
- Reasoning
- Yes
- Context window
- 200K
- Max output
- 131K
- Input price
- $0.06 / M
- Output price
- $0.40 / M
- Blended price
- $0.15 / M
- Output speed
- Not measured
- Value
- #25 of 219
- Knowledge cutoff
- April 2025
- Input
- text
- Hugging Face
- zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash
Category scores
Each category score combines every public result we have in that category.
- Coding 40.6
- Reasoning 20.9
- Math 36.1
- Knowledge 35.5
- Multilingual 46.5
- Instruction Following 70.1
- Long Context 40.9
- Writing & Preference 47.4
| Category | Score | Rank | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 40.6 | #135 | 1 |
| Reasoning | 20.9 | #229 | 2 |
| Math | 36.1 | #173 | 2 |
| Knowledge | 35.5 | #184 | 3 |
| Multilingual | 46.5 | #158 | 1 |
| Instruction Following | 70.1 | #167 | 1 |
| Long Context | 40.9 | #148 | 1 |
| Writing & Preference | 47.4 | #210 | 4 |
Strengths and weaknesses
Categories where GLM-4.7-Flash places highest and lowest among the models ranked in each, with its score against that category's median.
Strongest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 40.6 | +1.9 | #135 of 340, top 40% |
| Long Context | 40.9 | −0.0 | #148 of 296, top 50% |
| Math | 36.1 | −0.4 | #173 of 327, top 53% |
Weakest categories
| Category | Score | vs median | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|
| Writing & Preference | 47.4 | −6.3 | #210 of 312, top 68% |
| Reasoning | 20.9 | −2.7 | #229 of 350, top 66% |
| Knowledge | 35.5 | −1.9 | #184 of 314, top 59% |
Closest competitors
The models ranked just above and below GLM-4.7-Flash. When scores are this close, price and speed are often the better way to choose.
| Model | Rank | Score | Blended $/M | Speed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mistral Large 3 | #176 | 39.1 | $0.38 | 7 | Compare |
| GLM-4.5-Air | #177 | 38.9 | $0.43 | 160 | Compare |
| MiniMax-M2.1 | #178 | 38.9 | $0.52 | — | Compare |
| Qwen3-30B-A3B | #179 | 38.9 | $0.21 | 42 | Compare |
| Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | #181 | 38.8 | — | — | Compare |
| Qwen3.6 Flash | #182 | 38.8 | $0.42 | — | Compare |
| Olmo 3 32b Think | #183 | 38.7 | — | — | Compare |
| Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 | #184 | 38.6 | — | — | Compare |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Benchmark results
Every published result we track, with its source. Bold rows are the ones used for ranking; where several exist we prefer independent runs over self-reported numbers.
Coding
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | #146 of 294, top 50% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Reasoning
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | #114 of 129, top 89% | Epoch AI | 2026-08-28 | |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | none | Epoch AI | 2026-08-28 | |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | #156 of 297, top 53% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Math
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | #104 of 173, top 61% | Epoch AI | 2026-08-30 | |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 25% | none | Epoch AI | 2026-08-28 | |
| LMArena Math | 1355 | #162 of 285, top 57% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Knowledge
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | #114 of 186, top 62% | Epoch AI | 2026-08-30 | |
| GPQA Diamond | 45.1% | none | Epoch AI | 2026-08-30 | |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate (lower is better) | 9.3% | #45 of 96, top 47% | Vectara Hallucination Leaderboard | ||
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | #151 of 273, top 56% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Multilingual
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | #158 of 297, top 54% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | #138 of 285, top 49% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena French | 1332 | #151 of 223, top 68% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena German | 1337 | #140 of 231, top 61% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | #137 of 213, top 65% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | #157 of 283, top 56% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | #144 of 226, top 64% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Instruction Following
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | #160 of 298, top 54% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Long Context
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | #154 of 291, top 53% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
Writing & Preference
| Benchmark | Score | Position | Setting | Source | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | #158 of 297, top 54% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | #168 of 295, top 57% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 | |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | #93 of 115, top 81% | EQ-Bench | ||
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | #159 of 295, top 54% | LMArena | 2026-10-08 |
API pricing by provider
| Route | Input $/M | Output $/M | Cached input $/M | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bedrock | $0.07 | $0.40 | — | 2026-10-10 |
| deepinfra | $0.06 | $0.40 | $0.01 | 2026-10-10 |
| openrouter | $0.0605 | $0.40 | — | 2026-10-10 |
Compare GLM-4.7-Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3-30B-A3B
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs MiniMax-M2.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.6 Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GLM-4.5-Air
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Olmo 3 32b Think
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs GPT-6 Astra
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Claude Fable 5.1
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Gemini 3.8 Flash
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Kimi K3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Grok 4.6
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.3
- GLM-4.7-Flash vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Other Z.ai (Zhipu) models
- GLM-5.354.8
- GLM-5.3-Flash51.8
- GLM-5.251.1
- GLM-5.147.8
- GLM-546.1
- GLM-5V-Turbo43.8
- GLM-4.542.0
- GLM-4.742.0
Frequently asked questions
How good is GLM-4.7-Flash?
GLM-4.7-Flash by Z.ai (Zhipu) ranks 180th of 354 ranked models on the Noometry Index as of October 2026, with a score of 38.8. Its strongest category is coding, where it ranks 135th. API pricing starts at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens, with a 200K-token context window.
How much does GLM-4.7-Flash cost?
GLM-4.7-Flash costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens on deepinfra, with cached input at $0.01.
What is GLM-4.7-Flash's context window?
GLM-4.7-Flash accepts up to 200K tokens of input and can write up to 131K tokens in one response.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash open source?
Yes. GLM-4.7-Flash's weights are downloadable from Hugging Face (zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash); check the license for commercial terms.
What are GLM-4.7-Flash's strengths and weaknesses?
Relative to other ranked models, GLM-4.7-Flash places best in coding, long context, math and lowest in writing & preference, reasoning, knowledge.
What is GLM-4.7-Flash best at?
Its best category is coding, where it ranks 135th on Noometry.