Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Nemotron 3 Ultra
Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 7.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3 Ultra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 1 category and Nemotron 3 Ultra in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Nemotron 3 Ultra leads 66.3 to 47.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 58.3% for GLM-4.7-Flash and 86.7% for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
- GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $0.60 / $2.40 for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 44.7 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | 2026-06-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 200K | 262K |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 37.7 (#174)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1468 |
| FrontierCode | — | 13.6% |
| SciCode | — | 40.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.5% |
Reasoning Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 30.3 (#78)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 12% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1452 |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 90.1% |
| LMCA | — | 36.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.2 |
Math Too close to call
GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 34.4 (#160)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1456 |
| ProofBench | — | 2% |
Knowledge Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 52.5 (#56)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | 85.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1472 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 53.7 (#61)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1427 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1498 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | 1475 |
| LMArena German | 1336 | 1471 |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | 1387 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1415 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | 1452 |
Instruction Following Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 74.9 (#84)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1417 |
Long Context Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 43.9 (#77)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1437 |
Writing & Preference Nemotron 3 Ultra leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206), Nemotron 3 Ultra: 66.3 (#35)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1444 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1392 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | 1692 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1412 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Nemotron 3 Ultra?
Nemotron 3 Ultra is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.7 to 38.4 on the Noometry Index. GLM-4.7-Flash costs 7.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Nemotron 3 Ultra's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra?
GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra lists at $0.60 and $2.40.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Nemotron 3 Ultra better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3 Ultra does, with 262K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Nemotron 3 Ultra share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Ultra has 29.