Model comparison
Amazon Nova Micro vs GLM-4.7-Flash
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.7-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.7-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 70.1 to 56.3.
- Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.40 for GLM-4.7-Flash.
- GLM-4.7-Flash accepts more context: 200K tokens versus 128K.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Micro | GLM-4.7-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2026-01-19 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 200K |
| Max output | 10K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.035 | $0.06 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1383 |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132), GLM-4.7-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |
Reasoning GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294), GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1356 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |
Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254), GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1355 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 58.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237), GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | 9.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 1357 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 60.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239), GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1330 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1403 |
| LMArena French | 1238 | 1332 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 1337 |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | 1283 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 1332 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272), GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1327 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |
Long Context GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229), GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 1345 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.7-Flash leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247), GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GLM-4.7-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1342 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1125 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Micro better than GLM-4.7-Flash?
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 2.4× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GLM-4.7-Flash's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or GLM-4.7-Flash?
Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; GLM-4.7-Flash lists at $0.06 and $0.40.
Is Amazon Nova Micro or GLM-4.7-Flash better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GLM-4.7-Flash does, with 200K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and GLM-4.7-Flash share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.7-Flash has 21.