Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Granite 4.0 H Small
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.8 to 38.7.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133), Granite 4.0 H Small: 35.8 (#207)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1247 |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224), Granite 4.0 H Small: 23.4 (#164)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1240 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159), Granite 4.0 H Small: 29.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1251 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
Knowledge GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.5 (#210)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | 5.2% |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1244 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.7 (#223)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1250 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1198 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.9 (#178)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1221 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |
Long Context GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.6 (#209)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1240 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206), Granite 4.0 H Small: 44.0 (#222)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1243 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.