Model comparison
GLM-4.6V vs Hunyuan Vision 1.5
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.6V scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 56.6.
- GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 41.3 | 43.1 |
| Released | 2025-12-08 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1418 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1368 | 1416 |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1371 | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | 1180 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1359 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1340 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1352 | 1397 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1358 | 1404 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137), Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.6V | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1377 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1347 | 1388 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1360 | 1422 |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.6V better than Hunyuan Vision 1.5?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.6V or Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (40.9 vs 41.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.6V and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.6V has 12 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9.