Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs MiMo-V2-Flash
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 41.8 to 36.1.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 41.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 9 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), MiMo-V2-Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1392 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1409 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1404 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.