Model comparison
GLM-4.5-Air vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.5-Air scores higher in 6 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 2 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 55.9 to 47.2.
- GLM-4.5-Air has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5-Air | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2025-07-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 98K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.10 | — |
| Results tracked | 27 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
GLM-4.5-Air: 33.3 (#259), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1397 | 1270 |
| GSO | 2.9% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
GLM-4.5-Air: 24.1 (#166), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1379 | 1264 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 43% | — |
| ForecastBench | 59.2 | — |
Math Too close to call
GLM-4.5-Air: 36.2 (#170), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1396 | 1274 |
| Omni-MATH | 39.1% | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
GLM-4.5-Air: 35.0 (#191), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1370 | 1248 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 76.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 59.4% | — |
Multilingual GLM-4.5-Air leads
GLM-4.5-Air: 49.1 (#135), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1366 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1426 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | 1373 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1399 | — |
| LMArena German | 1377 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1348 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1386 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5-Air leads
GLM-4.5-Air: 69.6 (#171), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1354 | 1245 |
| IFEval | 81.2% | — |
Long Context GLM-4.5-Air leads
GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#135), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1366 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5-Air leads
GLM-4.5-Air: 55.9 (#139), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5-Air | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1384 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1343 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1371 | 1275 |
| WildBench | 78.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5-Air better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.5-Air or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 33.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5-Air and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5-Air has 27 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.