Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Mercury 2
Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 2 categories and Mercury 2 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Mercury 2 leads 53.8 to 47.2.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 39.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 50K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.75 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Mercury 2: 33.5 (#255)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1391 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1171 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Mercury 2: 23.8 (#170)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1362 |
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Mercury 2: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
Knowledge Mercury 2 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Mercury 2: 36.2 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1358 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |
Multilingual Mercury 2 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Mercury 2: 46.6 (#157)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1304 |
Instruction Following Mercury 2 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Mercury 2: 70.2 (#165)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1329 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Mercury 2: 40.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1330 |
Writing & Preference Mercury 2 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Mercury 2: 53.8 (#155)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1358 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Mercury 2?
Mercury 2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Mercury 2 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mercury 2 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.