Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Wizardlm 13b

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.1

Rank #88 Confirmed

Wizardlm 13b Microsoft

30.8

Rank #272 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 58.8 to 30.7.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Wizardlm 13b specifications
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 13b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.130.8
Released2026-04-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0765—
Output $ / M tokens$0.26—
Results tracked2810

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 13b
LMArena Coding14461035
LMArena WebDev1359—
SciCode40%—
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench927.17—

Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 13b
LMArena Hard Prompts14381018
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
DTBench74.9%—
LMCA29.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85—

Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 13b
LMArena Math14691017
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79), Wizardlm 13b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 13b
GPQA Diamond73.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
LMArena Expert1447—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43), Wizardlm 13b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 13b
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 13b
LMArena Non-English14221034
LMArena Chinese14951023
LMArena French1459—
LMArena Russian1434—
LMArena Spanish1415—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 13b
LMArena Instruction Following14201049

Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 13b
LMArena Longer Query14271054

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITWizardlm 13b
LMArena Text14341077
LMArena Creative Writing14011090
LMArena Multi-Turn14421047
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Wizardlm 13b?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Wizardlm 13b share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper