Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Mistral Small 3.2

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 4 categories and Mistral Small 3.2 in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 26.3.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 82.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 30.3% for Mistral Small 3.2.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0938 / $0.25 for Mistral Small 3.2.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 256K.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B ITMistral Small 3.2
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index43.531.2
Released2026-04-022025-06-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K256K
Max output33K16K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0675$0.0938
Output $ / M tokens$0.23$0.25
Results tracked286

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Mistral Small 3.2: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMistral Small 3.2
LMArena WebDev1359—
SciCode40%—
WeirdML35.2%—
LMArena Coding1447—
ALE-Bench927.17—

Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMistral Small 3.2
Chess Puzzles6%1%
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85131.74
Kagi LLM Benchmark—40.4%
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1439—
DTBench74.9%—
LMCA29.7%—

Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMistral Small 3.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%30.3%
LMArena Math1470—

Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMistral Small 3.2
GPQA Diamond73.2%49.1%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
LMArena Expert1447—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Mistral Small 3.2: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Mistral Small 3.2: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Non-English1421—
LMArena Chinese1495—
LMArena French1460—
LMArena Russian1434—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Mistral Small 3.2: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Instruction Following1420—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Mistral Small 3.2: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMistral Small 3.2
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITMistral Small 3.2
EQ-Bench Creative Writing13051255
LMArena Text1434—
LMArena Creative Writing1402—
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Mistral Small 3.2?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Mistral Small 3.2?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; Mistral Small 3.2 lists at $0.0938 and $0.25.

Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 256K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Mistral Small 3.2 share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.2 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper