Model comparison
ERNIE 5.1 vs Wizardlm 13b
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Baidu
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| ERNIE 5.1 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1035 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: —, Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
Reasoning ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1018 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
Math ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |
Multilingual ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |
Instruction Following ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1048 |
Long Context ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference ERNIE 5.1 leads
ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Wizardlm 13b?
ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is ERNIE 5.1 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.