Model comparison
MiMo-V2.5 vs Wizardlm 13b
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2.5 scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 30.5.
Side by side
| MiMo-V2.5 | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 43.4 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2026-04-22 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.28 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1469 | 1035 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1438 | — |
| SciCode | 43.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 513.95 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1450 | 1018 |
| CritPt | 3.7% | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1436 | 1017 |
| ProofBench | 16% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1460 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1247 | — |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1404 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1468 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1447 | — |
| LMArena German | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1363 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1416 | — |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1434 | 1048 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1445 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | MiMo-V2.5 | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1393 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is MiMo-V2.5 better than Wizardlm 13b?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is MiMo-V2.5 or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2.5 and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2.5 has 23 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.