Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 4 26B A4B IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 37.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 6% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 23% for Qwen3.7 Flash.
- Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0765 / $0.26 for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT.
- Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 39.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0765 | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.26 | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 28 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 23% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 144.62 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1469 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 82.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.5 on the Noometry Index. Qwen3.7 Flash costs 2.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Gemma 4 26B A4B IT's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Gemma 4 26B A4B IT lists at $0.0765 and $0.26.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.