Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Grok 3
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 5 categories and Grok 3 in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 36.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 82.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 55.6% for Grok 3.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Grok 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2025-04-09 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0765 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.26 | — |
| Results tracked | 28 | 40 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 3 leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156), Grok 3: 41.5 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 35.2% | 37.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | 1432 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —, Grok 3: 30.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 29.5% |
Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205), Grok 3: 13.8 (#322)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | 1433 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 138.34 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| SimpleBench | — | 36.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5.5% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61), Grok 3: 36.2 (#122)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | 55.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1469 | 1390 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 46.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 88.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 3.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79), Grok 3: 46.0 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 75.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | 5.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1420 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 78.8% |
| Confabulations | — | 14.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 65% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43), Grok 3: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68), Grok 3: 52.5 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | 1411 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1448 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | 1460 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1416 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | 1417 |
| LMArena German | — | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1374 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78), Grok 3: 75.2 (#69)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1409 |
| IFEval | — | 88.4% |
Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87), Grok 3: 38.7 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 1439 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 58.3% |
Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110), Grok 3: 56.0 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | Grok 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1426 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1414 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | 1186 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1424 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.4% |
| WildBench | — | 84.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Grok 3?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 39.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Grok 3 better for coding?
Grok 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 38.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Grok 3 share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Grok 3 has 40.