Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs GLM-5V-Turbo
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and GLM-5V-Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 3 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 39.4.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GLM-5V-Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 200K |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | $4 |
| Results tracked | 28 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | 1401 |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1466 |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1443 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1441 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1452 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1488 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1444 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1431 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1450 |
| LMArena German | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1423 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1438 |
Writing & Preference GLM-5V-Turbo leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1432 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than GLM-5V-Turbo?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and GLM-5V-Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or GLM-5V-Turbo?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or GLM-5V-Turbo better for coding?
GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and GLM-5V-Turbo share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.