Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiniMax-M3
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and MiniMax-M3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 25 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 25 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 3 categories and MiniMax-M3 in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M3 leads 58.4 to 45.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 73.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 90.9% for MiniMax-M3.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M3.
- MiniMax-M3 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiniMax-M3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-06-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 262K | 1M |
| Max output | 33K | 512K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 28 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), MiniMax-M3: 41.8 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | 1482 |
| SciCode | 40% | 47.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | 640.02 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14.7% |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —, MiniMax-M3: 22.6 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.7% |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 4.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 2,158 |
Reasoning MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), MiniMax-M3: 30.1 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | 3.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | 14% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1447 |
| DTBench | 74.9% | 78.9% |
| LMCA | 29.7% | 33.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | 146.95 |
| SimpleBench | — | 45.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 65.1% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 55% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.4 |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), MiniMax-M3: 40.0 (#95)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | 71.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1429 |
| ProofBench | — | 18% |
Knowledge MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), MiniMax-M3: 58.4 (#35)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | 90.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1461 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), MiniMax-M3: 40.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | 1253 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1435 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), MiniMax-M3: 53.0 (#75)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1447 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1432 |
| LMArena German | — | 1426 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1381 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1372 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), MiniMax-M3: 75.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1433 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), MiniMax-M3: 44.2 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiniMax-M3 leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), MiniMax-M3: 62.1 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiniMax-M3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1433 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1150 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than MiniMax-M3?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and MiniMax-M3 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or MiniMax-M3?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M3 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or MiniMax-M3 better for coding?
MiniMax-M3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax-M3 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and MiniMax-M3 share?
25 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M3 has 41.