Model comparison

GLM-5V-Turbo vs MiMo-V2.5

GLM-5V-Turbo and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5V-Turbo Z.ai (Zhipu)

43.8

Rank #84 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.5 Xiaomi

43.4

Rank #93 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5V-Turbo scores higher in 5 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 4 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $4 for GLM-5V-Turbo.
  • MiMo-V2.5 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 200K.
  • MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5V-Turbo and MiMo-V2.5 specifications
GLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2.5
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Xiaomi
Noometry Index43.843.4
Released2026-04-012026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K1.05M
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$1.20$0.14
Output $ / M tokens$4$0.28
Results tracked1923

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2.5
LMArena WebDev14011438
LMArena Coding14661469
SciCode—43.1%
ALE-Bench—513.95

Reasoning GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Hard Prompts14431450
CritPt—3.7%

Math GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Math14411436
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Expert14521460

Multimodal GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42), MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Vision12641247
LMArena Document1416—

Multilingual GLM-5V-Turbo leads

GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Non-English14201404
LMArena Chinese14881468
LMArena French14441447
LMArena German14231421
LMArena Korean13961363
LMArena Russian14311395
LMArena Spanish14501416
LMArena Japanese—1306

Instruction Following Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Instruction Following14231434

Long Context Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Longer Query14381445

Writing & Preference Too close to call

GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5V-TurboMiMo-V2.5
LMArena Text14371428
LMArena Creative Writing14161393
LMArena Multi-Turn14321445

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5V-Turbo better than MiMo-V2.5?

GLM-5V-Turbo and MiMo-V2.5 score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, GLM-5V-Turbo or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; GLM-5V-Turbo lists at $1.20 and $4.

Is GLM-5V-Turbo or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 42.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 does, with 1.05M tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5V-Turbo and MiMo-V2.5 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5V-Turbo has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper