Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 61.4 to 50.1.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 43.6 |
| Released | — | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1466 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1445 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1430 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1449 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1465 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1434 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1428 |
Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.