Model comparison

MiMo-V2-Omni vs MiniMax-M2

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

MiMo-V2-Omni Xiaomi

43.6

Rank #88 Confirmed

MiniMax-M2 MiniMax

37.4

Rank #204 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 29.7 to 19.4.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper at $0.14 / $0.28 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $1.20 for MiniMax-M2.
  • MiMo-V2-Omni accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 205K.
  • MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

MiMo-V2-Omni and MiniMax-M2 specifications
MiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2
ProviderXiaomiMiniMax
Noometry Index43.637.4
Released2026-03-182025-10-27
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K205K
Max output131K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.14$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$0.28$1.20
Results tracked1821

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2
LMArena Coding14661370
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—61%
LMArena WebDev—1297

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2
Terminal-Bench—30%
Vending-Bench 2—160.6

Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2
LMArena Hard Prompts14451357
Kagi LLM Benchmark—57.8%
NYT Connections (extended)—14.8%

Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2
LMArena Math14301352

Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2
LMArena Expert14491337

Multimodal Not comparable

MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63), MiniMax-M2: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2
LMArena Vision1228—

Multilingual MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2
LMArena Non-English14041313
LMArena Chinese14651366
LMArena French14471335
LMArena German13991355
LMArena Russian14121331
LMArena Spanish14341326
LMArena Japanese1317—
LMArena Korean1355—

Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2
LMArena Instruction Following14281328

Long Context MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2
LMArena Longer Query14421331

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads

MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMiMo-V2-OmniMiniMax-M2
LMArena Text14231340
LMArena Creative Writing13921286
LMArena Multi-Turn14451361

Frequently asked questions

Is MiMo-V2-Omni better than MiniMax-M2?

MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Omni or MiniMax-M2?

MiMo-V2-Omni is cheaper. It lists at $0.14 per million input tokens and $0.28 per million output tokens; MiniMax-M2 lists at $0.30 and $1.20.

Is MiMo-V2-Omni or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2-Omni does, with 262K tokens against 205K.

How many benchmarks do MiMo-V2-Omni and MiniMax-M2 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. MiMo-V2-Omni has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.

Related comparisons

Go deeper