Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.3 leads 52.5 to 34.2.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 43.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-17 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 30K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.50 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 40 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.3 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Grok 4.3: 41.6 (#121)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1415 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1357 |
| SciCode | — | 47.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 49.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 944.17 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Grok 4.3: 27.7 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 8% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1165 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 35.26 |
Reasoning Grok 4.3 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Grok 4.3: 35.9 (#68)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1396 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 55.2% |
| CritPt | — | 8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 25% |
| DTBench | — | 90.7% |
| LMCA | — | 38.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.16 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.3 |
Math Grok 4.3 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Grok 4.3: 46.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1388 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 42.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 14.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 11% |
Knowledge Grok 4.3 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Grok 4.3: 52.5 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1385 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 33.2% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Grok 4.3: 31.6 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1229 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 0% |
Multilingual Grok 4.3 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Grok 4.3: 50.5 (#120)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1385 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1422 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1412 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1379 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1356 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1399 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1398 |
Instruction Following Grok 4.3 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Grok 4.3: 72.1 (#140)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1366 |
Long Context Grok 4.3 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Grok 4.3: 42.5 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1393 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.3 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Grok 4.3: 58.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1397 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1380 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1406 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1075 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Grok 4.3?
Grok 4.3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Grok 4.3 better for coding?
Grok 4.3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Grok 4.3 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.3 has 40.