Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 50.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2025-05-20 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 33K | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.12 | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1269 | 1389 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1414 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1245 | 1395 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1310 | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1384 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1312 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1375 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1277 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.