Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs MiniMax-M2
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MiniMaxSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and MiniMax-M2 in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 19.4.
- MiniMax-M2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 37.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-10-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1370 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1357 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1352 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1337 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1331 |
| LMArena French | — | 1335 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1326 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1328 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1331 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1361 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than MiniMax-M2?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 37.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or MiniMax-M2 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 39.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and MiniMax-M2 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.