Noometry

Model comparison

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite Google

41.5

Rank #133 Confirmed

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 7 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 50.1 to 34.2.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemma 3n E4b IT
ProviderGoogleGoogle
Noometry Index41.537.3
Released2026-07-21—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1.05M—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.30—
Output $ / M tokens$2.50—
Results tracked3918

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Coding14531268
LMArena WebDev1440—
SciCode41.3%—
WeirdML39%—
ALE-Bench765.27—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemma 3n E4b IT
APEX-Agents29.3%—
GDP.pdf10%—

Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts14411284
ARC-AGI-210.3%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—31.5%
NYT Connections (extended)60.4%—
ARC-AGI-153.5%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles22%—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench83.5%—
LMCA37.6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index145.13—

Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Math14331251
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)26%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202571.1%—
ProofBench13%—

Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Expert14351246
GPQA Diamond83.3%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Vision1268—

Multilingual Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Non-English14271285
LMArena Chinese14691309
LMArena French14511330
LMArena German14541311
LMArena Japanese14271272
LMArena Korean14071259
LMArena Russian14431288
LMArena Spanish14421305

Instruction Following Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Instruction Following14201255

Long Context Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Longer Query14351276

Writing & Preference Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186)

BenchmarkGemini 3.5 Flash LiteGemma 3n E4b IT
LMArena Text14351306
LMArena Creative Writing14201287
LMArena Multi-Turn14451276
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1559—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper