Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Step 3

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 3 leads 36.8 to 11.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 25.2% for Gemma 3 4B and 62.3% for Step 3.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and Step 3 specifications
Gemma 3 4BStep 3
ProviderGoogleStepFun
Noometry Index28.140.5
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.04—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked2217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BStep 3
LMArena Coding12301367

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BStep 3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BStep 3
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%62.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts12531355
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA2.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02—

Math Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BStep 3
LMArena Math12391366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%—

Knowledge Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BStep 3
LMArena Expert12231333
GPQA Diamond23.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BStep 3
LMArena Vision—1177

Multilingual Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BStep 3
LMArena Non-English12731327
LMArena German12811371
LMArena Russian12941331
LMArena Chinese—1397
LMArena Korean—1269
LMArena Spanish—1371

Instruction Following Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following12391332

Long Context Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BStep 3
LMArena Longer Query12731326

Writing & Preference Step 3 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BStep 3
LMArena Text12911350
LMArena Creative Writing12711321
LMArena Multi-Turn12551341
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 4B or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Step 3 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper