Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs MiniMax M1

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax M1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

MiniMax M1 MiniMax

40.3

Rank #150 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax M1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax M1 leads 36.4 to 11.8.
  • Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.55 / $2.20 for MiniMax M1.
  • MiniMax M1 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and MiniMax M1 specifications
Gemma 3 4BMiniMax M1
ProviderGoogleMiniMax
Noometry Index28.140.3
Released2025-03-122025-06-13
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K1M
Max output4K40K
Input $ / M tokens$0.04$0.55
Output $ / M tokens$0.08$2.20
Results tracked2218

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiniMax M1 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMiniMax M1
LMArena Coding12301359

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), MiniMax M1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMiniMax M1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%—

Reasoning MiniMax M1 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMiniMax M1
LMArena Hard Prompts12531339
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA2.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02—

Math MiniMax M1 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMiniMax M1
LMArena Math12391361
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%—

Knowledge MiniMax M1 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMiniMax M1
LMArena Expert12231317
GPQA Diamond23.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%—

Multilingual MiniMax M1 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMiniMax M1
LMArena Non-English12731319
LMArena German12811350
LMArena Russian12941329
LMArena Chinese—1360
LMArena French—1370
LMArena Japanese—1217
LMArena Korean—1266
LMArena Spanish—1353

Instruction Following MiniMax M1 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMiniMax M1
LMArena Instruction Following12391312

Long Context MiniMax M1 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMiniMax M1
LMArena Longer Query12731326
Fiction.LiveBench—69.4%

Writing & Preference MiniMax M1 leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BMiniMax M1
LMArena Text12911343
LMArena Creative Writing12711298
LMArena Multi-Turn12551335
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 19× less per token, which makes it the better buy when MiniMax M1's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or MiniMax M1?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; MiniMax M1 lists at $0.55 and $2.20.

Is Gemma 3 4B or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiniMax M1 does, with 1M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and MiniMax M1 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper