Model comparison
GPT-4o vs Step 3
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
StepFunSummary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4o scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 9 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3 leads 34.9 to 10.2.
- Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-4o | Step 3 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 28.5 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2024-05-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 72 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3 leads
GPT-4o: 25.1 (#323), Step 3: 39.5 (#144)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1297 | 1367 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 31% | — |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 21.6% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 45.3% | — |
| GSO | 0% | — |
| WeirdML | 25.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 51.1% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 51.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 61.1% | — |
| CadEval | 26% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 87.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 72.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GPT-4o: 20.8 (#133), Step 3: —
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GDPval | 9.9% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 8.6% | — |
| Cybench | 12.5% | — |
| BALROG | 32.3% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1006 | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 40.8% | — |
Reasoning Step 3 leads
GPT-4o: 9.4 (#338), Step 3: 27.6 (#102)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1281 | 1355 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| SimpleBench | 17.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 4.5% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 13% | — |
| EnigmaEval | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 55.8% | — |
| DTBench | 64.5% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 60.9% | — |
| LMCA | 16.6% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 128.97 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
| LiveBench | 55.3% | — |
Math Step 3 leads
GPT-4o: 10.2 (#303), Step 3: 34.9 (#148)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1285 | 1366 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 0.4% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 6.4% | — |
| Omni-MATH | 29.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 49.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 53.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 0.3% | — |
Knowledge Step 3 leads
GPT-4o: 28.8 (#235), Step 3: 36.2 (#161)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1250 | 1333 |
| GPQA Diamond | 49.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 2.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 26% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 71.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 15.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.6% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 52% | — |
| MMLU | 88.1% | — |
Multimodal Too close to call
GPT-4o: 33.9 (#85), Step 3: 34.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1137 | 1176 |
| Video-MME | 71.9% | — |
| GeoBench | 71% | — |
| VPCT | 40% | — |
| ScienceQA | 88.5% | — |
Multilingual Step 3 leads
GPT-4o: 43.4 (#181), Step 3: 46.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1283 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1277 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | 1282 | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | 1234 | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | 1286 | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1292 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | 1303 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1257 | — |
Instruction Following Step 3 leads
GPT-4o: 66.8 (#202), Step 3: 70.6 (#159)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1278 | 1332 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 68.6% | — |
| IFEval | 81.7% | — |
Long Context Too close to call
GPT-4o: 39.4 (#174), Step 3: 40.3 (#152)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1289 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Step 3 leads
GPT-4o: 52.8 (#160), Step 3: 54.5 (#146)
| Benchmark | GPT-4o | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1300 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1291 | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1302 | 1340 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 81.8% | — |
| WildBench | 82.8% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 47.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-4o better than Step 3?
Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is GPT-4o or Step 3 better for coding?
Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 25.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GPT-4o and Step 3 share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4o has 72 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.