Model comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs Granite 4.2 8B
Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Granite 4.2 8B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 8B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 38.4 to 11.8.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.25 for Granite 4.2 8B.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 4B | Granite 4.2 8B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 40.5 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | 131K |
| Max output | 4K | 118K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | $0.06 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | $0.25 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1380 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Granite 4.2 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1329 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Granite 4.2 8B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |
Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1384 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
Multilingual Granite 4.2 8B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1302 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.2 8B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1301 |
Long Context Granite 4.2 8B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 8B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | 1236 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1301 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 4B better than Granite 4.2 8B?
Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Granite 4.2 8B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Granite 4.2 8B?
Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Granite 4.2 8B lists at $0.06 and $0.25.
Is Gemma 3 4B or Granite 4.2 8B better for coding?
Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 131K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Granite 4.2 8B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 8B has 11.