Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Granite 4.2 8B

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Granite 4.2 8B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 8B IBM

40.5

Rank #148 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 8B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 38.4 to 11.8.
  • Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.25 for Granite 4.2 8B.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and Granite 4.2 8B specifications
Gemma 3 4BGranite 4.2 8B
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index28.140.5
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K131K
Max output4K118K
Input $ / M tokens$0.04$0.06
Output $ / M tokens$0.08$0.25
Results tracked2211

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 8B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Coding12301380

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Granite 4.2 8B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.2 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 8B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Hard Prompts12531329
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA2.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Granite 4.2 8B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.2 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%—
LMArena Math1239—

Knowledge Granite 4.2 8B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Expert12231384
GPQA Diamond23.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%—

Multilingual Granite 4.2 8B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Non-English12731302
LMArena Russian12941285
LMArena Chinese—1366
LMArena German1281—

Instruction Following Granite 4.2 8B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Instruction Following12391301

Long Context Granite 4.2 8B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Longer Query12731324

Writing & Preference Granite 4.2 8B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.2 8B
LMArena Text12911320
LMArena Creative Writing12711236
LMArena Multi-Turn12551301
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Granite 4.2 8B?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 2.1× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Granite 4.2 8B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or Granite 4.2 8B?

Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; Granite 4.2 8B lists at $0.06 and $0.25.

Is Gemma 3 4B or Granite 4.2 8B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Both accept 131K tokens.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Granite 4.2 8B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper