Model comparison
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 vs Llama 2-13B
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads 60.1 to 29.8.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 2-13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 29.6 |
| Released | — | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 9 | 32 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 41.8 (#119), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1418 | 1062 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 28.9 (#97), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1051 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 42.2% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 58.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 106.17 |
| HellaSwag | — | 80.7% |
| LAMBADA | — | 76.5% |
| PIQA | — | 80.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.8% |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1065 |
| GSM8K | — | 36.9% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: —, Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1030 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 82.4% |
| MMLU | — | 55.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 57% |
| TriviaQA | — | 79.6% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 35.7 (#84), Llama 2-13B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
| ScienceQA | — | 55.8% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 50.3 (#125), Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1382 | 1024 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1001 |
| LMArena French | — | 1044 |
| LMArena German | — | 1009 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 894 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 953 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1087 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 73.7 (#117), Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1397 | 1045 |
Long Context Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 42.9 (#115), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1404 | 1064 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Vision 1.5 leads
Hunyuan Vision 1.5: 60.1 (#100), Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Vision 1.5 | Llama 2-13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1405 | 1084 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1388 | 1047 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1422 | 1050 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 better than Llama 2-13B?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Vision 1.5 or Llama 2-13B better for coding?
Hunyuan Vision 1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Vision 1.5 and Llama 2-13B share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Vision 1.5 has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.