Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs GPT-5.2 Pro
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 32.6.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 52.3 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-11 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 400K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $21 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $168 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.4 |
Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1157 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), GPT-5.2 Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than GPT-5.2 Pro?
GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and GPT-5.2 Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.