Model comparison

GPT-5.2 Pro vs Wizardlm 70b

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

GPT-5.2 Pro OpenAI

52.3

Rank #39 Reported

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 65.3 to 32.2.
  • Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GPT-5.2 Pro and Wizardlm 70b specifications
GPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 70b
ProviderOpenAIMicrosoft
Noometry Index52.333.0
Released2025-12-11—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window400K—
Max output128K—
Input $ / M tokens$21—
Output $ / M tokens$168—
Results tracked812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding—1081

Reasoning GPT-5.2 Pro leads

GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 70b
ARC-AGI-254.2%—
SimpleBench57.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.3%—
ARC-AGI-190.5%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1079
Epoch Capabilities Index155.4—

Math GPT-5.2 Pro leads

GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 70b
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)74%—
FrontierMath Tier 446%—
LMArena Math—1116
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)31.3%—

Multilingual Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English—1078
LMArena Chinese—1052
LMArena German—1083
LMArena Russian—1155

Instruction Following Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following—1093

Long Context Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query—1097

Writing & Preference Not comparable

GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-5.2 ProWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text—1120
LMArena Creative Writing—1149
LMArena Multi-Turn—1108

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Wizardlm 70b?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Wizardlm 70b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper