Model comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Gemma 2 2b IT

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash DeepSeek

52.8

Rank #38 Confirmed

Gemma 2 2b IT Google

33.1

Rank #248 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads 66.7 to 32.6.

Side by side

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 2 2b IT specifications
DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 2b IT
ProviderDeepSeekGoogle
Noometry Index52.833.1
Released2026-09-09—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window1M—
Max output393K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.15—
Output $ / M tokens$0.60—
Results tracked3717

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 52.9 (#32), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Coding15061112
LMArena WebDev1619—
SciCode51.9%—
ALE-Bench1,092—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 31.2 (#69), Gemma 2 2b IT: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 2b IT
APEX-Agents39.5%—
GDP.pdf19.8%—

Reasoning DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 50.2 (#36), Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Hard Prompts14831113
NYT Connections (extended)89.6%—
CritPt14.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles43%—
DTBench89.9%—
LMCA47%—
Surface Evolver Bench46.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.9—

Math DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 66.7 (#25), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Math14771135
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)67.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 426.8%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202598.3%—
ProofBench54%—

Knowledge DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 57.9 (#38), Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Expert15061096
GPQA Diamond89.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 39.1 (#61), Gemma 2 2b IT: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Vision1277—
Furniture Assembly34.2%—

Multilingual DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 55.0 (#35), Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Non-English14481121
LMArena Chinese14971132
LMArena French14521157
LMArena German14841114
LMArena Japanese14121083
LMArena Korean14521055
LMArena Russian14711118
LMArena Spanish14591140

Instruction Following DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 77.3 (#26), Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Instruction Following14741118

Long Context DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 45.2 (#47), Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Longer Query14751130

Writing & Preference DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 65.4 (#48), Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkDeepSeek V4.1 FlashGemma 2 2b IT
LMArena Text14621156
LMArena Creative Writing14351147
LMArena Multi-Turn14571118
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1540—

Frequently asked questions

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash better than Gemma 2 2b IT?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.8 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemma 2 2b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has 37 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper