Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Grok 4.7
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 2 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.7 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4.7 leads 70.0 to 36.5.
- Gemma 2 2b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | |
| Noometry Index | 33.1 | 53.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-09-21 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 500K |
| Max output | — | 500K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273), Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | 1427 |
| FrontierCode | — | 47.6% |
| CursorBench | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1639 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 29.5% |
| SciCode | — | 57.8% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 54.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 22.8% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 10,537 |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224), Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1413 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 76.8% |
| CritPt | — | 18% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 38% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 29% |
| DTBench | — | 96% |
| LMCA | — | 49.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.53 |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212), Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | 1407 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 53% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 98.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 34% |
Knowledge Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231), Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | 1422 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 56% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 32.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20.8% |
Multilingual Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257), Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | 1389 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1455 |
| LMArena French | 1157 | 1455 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1397 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | 1400 |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
Instruction Following Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263), Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | 1404 |
Long Context Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250), Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | 1413 |
Writing & Preference Grok 4.7 leads
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263), Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Grok 4.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | 1399 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 2007 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Grok 4.7?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 2 2b IT or Grok 4.7 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Grok 4.7 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.7 has 39.