Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs Granite 4.0 H Small
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 1 category and Granite 4.0 H Small in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 68.7 to 54.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 H Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | |
| Noometry Index | 31.3 | 36.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1084 | 1249 |
| HumanEval+ | 35.4% | — |
| MBPP+ | 45% | — |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1071 | 1240 |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1107 | 1247 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
Knowledge Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1039 | 1251 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1052 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1049 | 1258 |
| LMArena French | 1065 | — |
| LMArena German | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 971 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 988 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1057 | 1222 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |
Long Context Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1056 | 1242 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1094 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1060 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1040 | 1242 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than Granite 4.0 H Small?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?
Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and Granite 4.0 H Small share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.