Model comparison
Command A vs Gemma 1.1 7b IT
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Command A scores higher in 6 categories and Gemma 1.1 7b IT in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Command A leads 45.3 to 28.1.
Side by side
| Command A | Gemma 1.1 7b IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 31.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-13 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Command A: 27.2 (#322), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1330 | 1084 |
| Aider Polyglot | 12% | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 35.4% |
| MBPP+ | — | 45% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Command A: 35.9 (#40), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 57.1% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads
Command A: 18.3 (#283), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1326 | 1071 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 28.8% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| LMCA | 10.3% | — |
Math Command A leads
Command A: 36.2 (#171), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1300 | 1107 |
Knowledge Command A leads
Command A: 37.1 (#159), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | 1039 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multilingual Command A leads
Command A: 45.3 (#170), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1313 | 1052 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1327 | 1061 |
| LMArena French | 1351 | 1065 |
| LMArena German | 1341 | 1054 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1285 | 971 |
| LMArena Korean | 1285 | 988 |
| LMArena Russian | 1314 | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1347 | 1049 |
Instruction Following Command A leads
Command A: 69.1 (#177), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1309 | 1057 |
Long Context Command A leads
Command A: 40.6 (#151), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1334 | 1056 |
Writing & Preference Command A leads
Command A: 47.6 (#208), Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288)
| Benchmark | Command A | Gemma 1.1 7b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1331 | 1094 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1319 | 1060 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1339 | 1040 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1145 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command A better than Gemma 1.1 7b IT?
Command A is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command A or Gemma 1.1 7b IT better for coding?
Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.5 versus 27.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command A and Gemma 1.1 7b IT share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command A has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19.