Model comparison
Granite 4.0 H Small vs Qwen-14B
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen-14B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 68.7 to 52.4.
Side by side
| Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.5 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1249 | 1071 |
Reasoning Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163), Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1240 | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 113.03 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Too close to call
Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223), Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1247 | 1068 |
| Omni-MATH | 29.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 56.9% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1251 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228), Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1041 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1249 | 1077 |
| LMArena Russian | 1201 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183), Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1222 | 1031 |
| IFEval | 89% | — |
Long Context Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213), Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1242 | 1028 |
Writing & Preference Granite 4.0 H Small leads
Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227), Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299)
| Benchmark | Granite 4.0 H Small | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1241 | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1211 | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1242 | 1022 |
| WildBench | 73.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 4.0 H Small better than Qwen-14B?
Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 4.0 H Small or Qwen-14B better for coding?
Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 4.0 H Small and Qwen-14B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 4.0 H Small has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.