Model comparison

Gemma 1.1 7b IT vs o3-mini

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 1.1 7b IT Google

31.3

Rank #277 Confirmed

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #212 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 7b IT scores higher in 2 categories and o3-mini in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where o3-mini leads 75.1 to 54.0.
  • Gemma 1.1 7b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 1.1 7b IT and o3-mini specifications
Gemma 1.1 7b ITo3-mini
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index31.336.7
Released—2024-12-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—200K
Max output—100K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.10
Output $ / M tokens—$4.40
Results tracked1951

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-mini leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 31.5 (#284), o3-mini: 40.8 (#132)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITo3-mini
LMArena Coding10841378
Aider Polyglot—60.4%
SciCode—39.8%
GSO—1.3%
WeirdML—43.7%
LiveBench Coding—82.7%
CadEval—54%
HumanEval+35.4%—
MBPP+45%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: —, o3-mini: 29.6 (#84)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITo3-mini
Cybench—22.5%

Reasoning Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 20.5 (#238), o3-mini: 16.3 (#305)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITo3-mini
LMArena Hard Prompts10711366
ARC-AGI-2—3%
SimpleBench—22.8%
ARC-AGI-1—34.5%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—17%
LiveBench Reasoning—89.6%
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—68.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—70.6%
LMCA—19%
Epoch Capabilities Index—140.34
ForecastBench—59.6
LiveBench—75.9%

Math Gemma 1.1 7b IT leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.0 (#220), o3-mini: 28.1 (#244)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITo3-mini
LMArena Math11071396
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—76.9%
LiveBench Math—77.3%
MATH Level 5—96.5%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—12.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%

Knowledge o3-mini leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.3 (#247), o3-mini: 38.3 (#146)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITo3-mini
LMArena Expert10391364
GPQA Diamond—77%
SimpleQA Verified—15.3%
Confabulations—17.9%

Multilingual o3-mini leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 28.1 (#273), o3-mini: 45.7 (#164)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITo3-mini
LMArena Non-English10521319
LMArena Chinese10611379
LMArena French10651334
LMArena German10541303
LMArena Japanese9711286
LMArena Korean9881314
LMArena Russian10461304
LMArena Spanish10491321

Instruction Following o3-mini leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 54.0 (#283), o3-mini: 75.1 (#72)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITo3-mini
LMArena Instruction Following10571337
LiveBench Instruction Following—84.4%

Long Context o3-mini leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 32.1 (#272), o3-mini: 33.8 (#256)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITo3-mini
LMArena Longer Query10561343
Fiction.LiveBench—50%

Writing & Preference o3-mini leads

Gemma 1.1 7b IT: 30.4 (#288), o3-mini: 50.3 (#182)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 1.1 7b ITo3-mini
LMArena Text10941337
LMArena Creative Writing10601286
LMArena Multi-Turn10401320
Short-Story Creative Writing—61.7%
LiveBench Language—50.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT better than o3-mini?

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 31.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 1.1 7b IT or o3-mini better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 31.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 7b IT and o3-mini share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 7b IT has 19 scored results on Noometry and o3-mini has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper