Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 45.6 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-21 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1235 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1220 |
Math Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1242 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 42.7% |
Knowledge Gemma 1.1 2b IT leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1246 |
| LMArena German | 944 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1233 |
Long Context Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1224 |
Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1256 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1231 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?
Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.