Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Wizardlm 70b
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Wizardlm 70b leads 34.8 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1081 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1079 |
Math Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | — |
Multilingual Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1155 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
Instruction Following Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1093 |
Long Context Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Wizardlm 70b leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Wizardlm 70b?
Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.