Model comparison

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B in 6 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads 45.6 to 31.1.

Side by side

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B specifications
Phi 3 Small 8k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
ProviderMicrosoftAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index29.333.0
Released2024-04-232024-11-21
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 36.0 (#214)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Coding11011235
LiveBench Coding20.3%—

Reasoning Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 23.9 (#169)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Hard Prompts11001220
LiveBench Reasoning15.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis30.3%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.1%—
HellaSwag77%—
LiveBench24%—
WinoGrande81.5%—

Math Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 14.2 (#303)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Math11511242
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—4.4%
LiveBench Math17.6%—
MATH Level 5—42.7%

Knowledge Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 25.0 (#264)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
GPQA Diamond—46.3%
LMArena Expert1067—
ARC (AI2) Challenge90.7%—
MMLU75.7%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA58.1%—

Multilingual Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 39.9 (#222)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Non-English10581236
LMArena Chinese10611249
LMArena Russian11111246
LMArena French1135—
LMArena German1080—
LMArena Japanese966—
LMArena Korean894—
LMArena Spanish1111—

Instruction Following Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 64.8 (#227)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Instruction Following10871233
LiveBench Instruction Following47.2%—

Long Context Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 37.1 (#222)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Longer Query10881224

Writing & Preference Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284), Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B: 45.6 (#223)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructTulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B
LMArena Text11101256
LMArena Creative Writing10831231
LMArena Multi-Turn10681252
LiveBench Language12.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B better for coding?

Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.0 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Tulu 3 (Tülu 3) 70B has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper