Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 34.1 to 25.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.1 (#299), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1130 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 19.1 (#270), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1127 |
Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.8 (#232), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1173 |
Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.5 (#258), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1108 |
Multilingual Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.6 (#289), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1012 | 1108 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1101 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1145 |
| LMArena French | — | 1110 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |
Instruction Following Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 49.9 (#299), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1113 |
Long Context Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.6 (#286), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1120 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.1 (#306), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1107 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 959 | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.