Model comparison
Gemma 1.1 2b IT vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 1.1 2b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.2 to 25.3.
Side by side
| Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 28.8 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1034 | 1318 |
| HumanEval+ | 17.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 23.3% | — |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1302 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1047 | 1315 |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 970 | 1272 |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 988 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1011 | 1300 |
| LMArena German | 944 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 990 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena Korean | 899 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 992 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1003 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Gemma 1.1 2b IT | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1022 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 998 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 958 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 1.1 2b IT or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 1.1 2b IT and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.